A more conservative 2:1:3:3 would be far more less to destroy a video or cause ghosting then the present spatial setting etc which to me appear quite high for moderate denoising. Similarly the other two ports of HQDN3D especially the HQ denoise settings I see are very high indeed( if I'm reading correctly?), if they are set at default. The other option for the temporal only FluxsmoothT is the one which does both interlaced and progressive, so if I decrease the spatial settings to O or can it go to minus -1?(if so one should be using the other version anyway!) does the script then switch to FluxsmoothT, therefore the script which Avidemux uses a port of can be used on both an interlaced or progressive source? ![]() Quote from its readme 'Interlacing: Progressive or interlaced (FluxSmoothT), or progressive only (FluxSmoothST)' Here we go!įluxsmooth at default 7/7 is I assume the settings for FluxsmoothST which only works on progressive sources. ![]() I'm reasonably well versed with Avisynth scripts, their usage, chain format and options. I would like a bit of advice from more experienced users please regarding my observations using Avidemux in WinXP and Win7 where I tested 2.7.0 version. My initial observations have been positive. I've recently returned to using Avidemux after many years absence and it is pleasing to see a stable 2.7.x branch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |